Closet Picks

Against the shelf

What kind of cinema

A leaderboard only tells you what is popular. These compare each slice of the collection with how often guests reach into it, so 1.00 means exactly as often as the shelf predicts.

By decade

Decade In collection Picks Reached for Films reached
1920s 24 28
0.70
79%
1930s 128 93
0.43
54%
1940s 131 185
0.84
60%
1950s 197 328
0.99
74%
1960s 349 483
0.83
80%
1970s 266 488
1.09
79%
1980s 205 440
1.28
77%
1990s 184 425
1.38
79%
2000s 89 233
1.56
82%
2010s 66 98
0.89
71%
2020s 71 64
0.54
49%

The index compares each decade's share of single-film picks with its share of the collection. Box sets are excluded from it: taking the Bergman set is a decision about Bergman, not about the 1950s.

By country

Reached for most

CountryShelfIndex
Soviet Union 16
2.05
Poland 11
1.63
Mexico 16
1.53
United States 579
1.48
Spain 15
1.43

Walked past most

CountryShelfIndex
Hong Kong 38
0.19
Iran 30
0.32
India 18
0.33
Sweden 66
0.35
Japan 216
0.46
Every country with at least 10 films
Country In collection Picks Reached for Films reached
United States 579 1436
1.48
80%
France 277 308
0.66
69%
Japan 216 165
0.46
62%
United Kingdom 142 269
1.13
70%
Italy 88 174
1.18
76%
Sweden 66 39
0.35
83%
Germany 40 56
0.84
60%
Hong Kong 38 12
0.19
79%
Iran 30 16
0.32
37%
Canada 19 37
1.16
79%
India 18 10
0.33
56%
Czechoslovakia 17 26
0.91
94%
Mexico 16 41
1.53
94%
Soviet Union 16 55
2.05
75%
Spain 15 36
1.43
80%
Denmark 14 22
0.94
100%
Belgium 11 10
0.54
82%
Poland 11 30
1.63
64%

Criterion's listing gives one country per film, so a co-production counts only under whichever country Criterion credits first. Countries with fewer than 10 films in the collection are left out.

By trade

Criterion says what each guest does for a living, and it turns out to predict the one thing you would expect it to least: whether they walk out with a film in another language. Guests who direct and do not act reach for subtitles 18 points more often than guests who act and do not direct. The guests who do both sit between them, which is the part that makes it an ordering rather than a coincidence.

Share of picks in a language other than English, by trade
acts, does not direct 29%
acts and directs 38%
directs, does not act 48%
single-film picks films reached, box sets opened
Table view
Share of picks in a language other than English, by trade
single-film picks 95% interval Picks films reached, box sets opened
acts, does not direct 29% 26% to 33% 821 46%
acts and directs 38% 32% to 43% 307 57%
directs, does not act 48% 44% to 51% 747 69%
the shelf 55% · · ·

Two things worth reading off the second lens. Everyone reaches for subtitles less often than the shelf offers when they choose a single film, and directors overtake the shelf once box sets are opened. The box sets are where the subtitles arrive.

The same share, year by year
acts, does not direct
23%
acts and directs
39%
directs, does not act
34%

Every panel is drawn to the same scale, topping out at 80%. The rule across all three is the shelf, 55%.

Table view
The same share, year by year
Filmed acts, does not directacts and directsdirects, does not act
2022 33% of 36 · 35% of 40
2023 46% of 85 46% of 24 50% of 156
2024 30% of 205 33% of 57 49% of 163
2025 28% of 256 35% of 103 45% of 181
2026 23% of 214 39% of 80 34% of 38

Guests who act are a recent arrival: there were seven visits by directors and none by an actor in 2012, and the two are near parity now. So the pooled comparison above is also a comparison of eras, and this is the control. What survives it is the gap between the two ends: in every one of these years, guests who direct reached for subtitles more often than guests who act. The three-way ordering does not survive. The middle group is the smallest in every column and it sits a whisker under the actors in 2023 and over the directors in 2026, so read it as corroboration and not as a third result. Years need at least 25 single-film picks from both ends of the divide to earn a column, and the last one is a part-year, so its final point is the least settled figure on the chart.

Every trade, counted as many times as it applies

The three groups above are exclusive. This table is not: a guest described as an actor and a director is both, the same way a film is several genres at once. Trades are read off 299 of the guests and 124 carry no description to read.

Trade Guests Visits Picks Subtitled Box sets Median age of pick
acts 155 157 1,130 32% 11% 45 yrs
directs 150 154 1,061 45% 16% 47 yrs
writes 100 102 668 38% 16% 45 yrs
makes music 32 32 187 31% 14% 41 yrs

A trade is read from Criterion's own description of the guest and only on a solo visit, so a pair filmed together carries neither person's job. The three groups in the divide are exclusive; the table above them is not, because a guest described as an actor and a director is both.

By genre

Genres are TMDB's, over the 1681 of 1718 collection films that carry one (98%). A film carries several at once, so these shares sum past 100%.

Genre In collection Picks Reached for Films reached
Drama 1255 2283
1.06
72%
Comedy 387 750
1.13
79%
Romance 373 665
1.04
72%
Crime 251 473
1.10
68%
Thriller 211 434
1.20
72%
Documentary 133 125
0.55
73%
Action 122 42
0.20
74%
Adventure 116 113
0.57
85%
History 116 181
0.91
63%
Mystery 106 214
1.18
75%
Fantasy 97 164
0.99
79%
War 82 116
0.82
65%
Horror 78 169
1.26
80%
Music 69 98
0.83
75%
Science Fiction 68 96
0.82
74%
Western 35 68
1.13
94%
Family 22 40
1.06
77%

The canon or the new releases

A spine number is roughly release order, so low numbers are the films Criterion built its name on. Guests land almost exactly in the middle: the mean pick sits at the 49% mark, against the 50% a blindfolded guest would manage.

Spine range In collection Picks Reached for
1-266 252 646
1.13
267-532 252 430
0.75
533-796 252 584
1.02
797-1057 252 707
1.24
1058-1337 252 490
0.86

Deepest into the back catalogue

Newest taste

Over the 1260 films that carry a spine number. The other 458 are non-spine releases and are excluded rather than treated as spine zero.